Joined
·
11,550 Posts
VIENNA (Reuters) - OPEC on Wednesday forged ahead with tighter oil supply curbs, deaf to consumer country complaints about crude prices recently at 13-year highs.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed to turn down the taps despite calls from the United States for cheaper fuel.
The United States had pressed OPEC to lift export restrictions to help control prices at the pump and prevent energy inflation slowing economic growth.
Delegates said cartel powerhouse Saudi Arabia led the push for implementing cuts of one million barrels a day or four percent from April 1, as first agreed in Algiers in February.
"The Saudis have gone from being a reliable OPEC price dove to OPEC's arch price hawk," said independent energy consultant Mehdi Varzi.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle....EZSFFA?type=businessNews&storyID=4715532§
The article goes on to speculate:
The Saudis have gone from being a reliable OPEC price dove to OPEC's arch price hawk," said independent energy consultant Mehdi Varzi.
"That's because of the demands of the Saudi budget. They need higher and higher oil prices every year to meet current expenditure for a larger and larger population."
The White House stopped short of openly criticizing OPEC but called for adequate supplies. A spokesman said: "It is important for producers not to take actions that hurt our economy."
OPEC blames speculative investment funds, now commanding record positions on energy contracts, for this year's oil price spike.
Gary Ross of leading U.S. energy consultancy PIRA Energy said: "We estimate speculative funds have already invested $15 billion in oil futures contracts in New York and London. This decision is only going to encourage the speculators to stay long on oil markets."
I wonder if these are the only reasons?
I think that they are sending us a message although what seems less clear.
Certainly it is a message to Bush a not very veiled threat.
Clearly a rise in oil prices will effect our economy Does the number $10 rise in oil price = 1% gnp sound right?
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries agreed to turn down the taps despite calls from the United States for cheaper fuel.
The United States had pressed OPEC to lift export restrictions to help control prices at the pump and prevent energy inflation slowing economic growth.
Delegates said cartel powerhouse Saudi Arabia led the push for implementing cuts of one million barrels a day or four percent from April 1, as first agreed in Algiers in February.
"The Saudis have gone from being a reliable OPEC price dove to OPEC's arch price hawk," said independent energy consultant Mehdi Varzi.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle....EZSFFA?type=businessNews&storyID=4715532§
The article goes on to speculate:
The Saudis have gone from being a reliable OPEC price dove to OPEC's arch price hawk," said independent energy consultant Mehdi Varzi.
"That's because of the demands of the Saudi budget. They need higher and higher oil prices every year to meet current expenditure for a larger and larger population."
The White House stopped short of openly criticizing OPEC but called for adequate supplies. A spokesman said: "It is important for producers not to take actions that hurt our economy."
OPEC blames speculative investment funds, now commanding record positions on energy contracts, for this year's oil price spike.
Gary Ross of leading U.S. energy consultancy PIRA Energy said: "We estimate speculative funds have already invested $15 billion in oil futures contracts in New York and London. This decision is only going to encourage the speculators to stay long on oil markets."
I wonder if these are the only reasons?
I think that they are sending us a message although what seems less clear.
Certainly it is a message to Bush a not very veiled threat.
Clearly a rise in oil prices will effect our economy Does the number $10 rise in oil price = 1% gnp sound right?