Tech Support Guy banner

Mass Resignations at Carter Center

1693 Views 45 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  LANMaster
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116852889902273906.html?mod=home_whats_news_us

ATLANTA -- Fourteen members of an advisory board at the Carter Center resigned today, concluding they could "no longer in good conscience continue to serve" following publication of former President Jimmy Carter's controversial book, "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid."
You need a WSJ account to read the full article, but another site (digg.com) has this up and someone in the comments section posted the letter from the article:

"Dear President Carter,

As members of the Board of Councilors each one of us has been proud to be associated with the Carter Center in its noble struggle to repair the world. However, in light of the publication of your latest book Palestine; Peace Not Apartheid and your subsequent comments made in promoting the book, we can no longer in good conscience continue to serve the Center as members of the Board of Councilors.

In its work in conflict resolution the Carter Center has always played the useful and constructive role of honest broker and mediator between warring parties. In your book, which portrays the conflict between Israel and her neighbors as a purely one-sided affair with Israel holding all of the responsibility for resolving the conflict, you have clearly abandoned your historic role of broker in favor of becoming an advocate for one side."
*EDIT: The end of the letter, from the LGF site:

"It seems that you have turned to a world of advocacy, including even malicious advocacy," the board members wrote in a letter, a copy of which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. "We can no longer endorse your strident and uncompromising position. This is not the Carter Center or Jimmy Carter we came to respect and support. Therefore it is with sadness and regret that we hereby tender our resignation from the Board of Councilors of the Carter Center effective immediately."
Little Green Footballs has this up here along with a related article:

Melvin Konner, physician and professor at Emory University, declined an invitation to be part of a group advising President Carter and The Carter Center on Carter's recent book on the Mideast. Konner notes especially that "President Carter has proved capable of distorting the truth about such meetings and consultations in public remarks following them. In particular, he mischaracterized the meeting he had with the executive committee of the Board of Rabbis of Greater Phoenix, saying he and they had positive interactions and prayed together, when in fact others present stated that the meeting was highly confrontational and that the prayer was merely a pro forma closing invocation." Konner says also that "in television interviews I have seen over the past week, President Carter has revealed himself to be so rigid and inflexible in his views that he seems to me no longer capable of dialogue."
21 - 40 of 46 Posts
anybody catch the article today where Gerald Ford spoke about his opinion of numerous presidents? it was conditional that the comments not be revealed until his death. his friendship with Carter is not reflected in his opinion of Carter as a president.
Fidelista said:
The only people I know of that don't accept the reality of Israel--want to eliminate-- is not the left --but extreme right.:down:
Nearly everyone wants a just and peaceful solution. Few have worked as hard as J. Carter.
I don't know of anything that is considered "helpful criticism" of Israel however -- bait for attack, and will get immediate response from lobby. Off limits for Americans and others in the west. In some nations in Europe -- even speaking of disagreement with official descritption of holacaust can land one in jail--a fact. Thank goodness we still honor freedom of speech in U.S. --right or wrong >f
Nearly everyone? Thats a joke. Most people of your political bent are obsessively attacking Israel with absolutely no criticism of the Palestenians. You mention a lobby--what lobby is that? (Sounds like you are buying the Arab press hook line and sinker). I assume that you want Jews who support Israel not to react when attacks are made. As far as Europe goes, don't compare it to the US----we don't have their history vis a vis hatred for Jews. Next thing you will be telling us is that the "lobby" is the reason they have those laws.
I am not a citizen of the US and, therefore, ought not to intrude on the debate here. However, I've been waiting for someone - anyone - to demonstrate why it is that Mr Carter has refused to debate with Alan Dershowitz the allegations he makes in his book.

Carter, as I recall, was not much of a president, his good intentions notwithstanding. (Didn't someone mention the road to hell is paved with those?) He gave in too often to Brzezinski (spelling?) and was responsible, ultimately, for the botched raid on Tehran.

But this aside, why does he not admit to the millions of dollars Ehrenfeld traces in donations to the Carter Centre by the House of Saud or the donations made by the Sheik of Dubai, both not exactly lovers of all things Jewish? No, Mr Carter has a lot to answer for, his book being only the latest.

More information may be found at http://adershowitz.gather.com/ and Dershowitz's challenge at http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976879837

I now suppose I'll have the liberal lobby baying for my blood.

Regards,
Lane
See less See more
Fidelista said:
The only people I know of that don't accept the reality of Israel--want to eliminate-- is not the left --but extreme right.:down: ...
Hi Fidelista,

You should come in Europe and see the far-leftists whoring with the Hizbullah sympathisers ! :down:
We call them in French the bobos islamogauchistes which means : the well-off islamoleftist bourgeois !
The left practices selective morality. Then again, so does the right.
linskyjack said:
Nearly everyone? Thats a joke. Most people of your political bent are obsessively attacking Israel with absolutely no criticism of the Palestenians. You mention a lobby--what lobby is that? (Sounds like you are buying the Arab press hook line and sinker). I assume that you want Jews who support Israel not to react when attacks are made. As far as Europe goes, don't compare it to the US----we don't have their history vis a vis hatred for Jews. Next thing you will be telling us is that the "lobby" is the reason they have those laws.
I honestly know no one on left--personally --that wants the Israeli to be wiped out , or without a nation, but you will hear critisism from the left , while the right is generally silent.
I believe the democrats do support Israel ,and always have , not likely Israel would have survived were it not so. There continues to be strong support in Congress --by both Dems and Repubs --but some of the liberals do have limits . Others offer blanket support regardless of subject.
The lobby? . Not the actual lobbies. By lobby I mean those very vocal defenders of anything Israeli. Make a negative observation of a Israeli policy or action and they make more noise than a frightened flock of geese !
I expect Jews to react to attack, not to would be unrealistic.
I believe Carters book, although written as he sees things, recollects, is not ALL wrong.
One thing that is frustrating about Israel vs Palestine is this . When bargaining for peace , Israel bargains from such a position of power , they are far less likely to make any real consessions. They are not worried with survival of State , and have continued to gain real estate over years. I think thats what frustrates people of my "political bent'.
Its a given that it would be this way as Israel is not only a military power, but a economic one , with complete and unconditional support of a super power.
As far as condemning the Palestinians, it obvious that their leadership has went downhill.
Hamas and other militant groups have made things nearly impossible to fix , and empowered the hawks {likud} in Israel. The best time for resolution has passed , in the 80's IMO.
The future looks pretty bleak to me now and I have no good anwers.
As far as current anti-semitism--hatred of Jews in Europe ? . I can't really offer opinion other than I have read history.
I do know that much support of Israel in the U.S. comes not only from politic, but from religious influences. How this plays in Europe , I don't know.
I am glad to see you recognize that Carter is not a anti-semite, or condones murder of Jews. Thats one reason I read your posts carefully, you don't seem to align with crack-pots.:)
I do really condemn the lack of free-speech in Europe !. If a nutcase says Jews were not slaughtered in WW2--he has right to make fool of himself.
I am amazed that Europeans would stand for speech restrictions -- not much different than Cuba!.
I guess I am spoiled with U.S.freedoms --proud actually. >f
See less See more
laneseda said:
I am not a citizen of the US and, therefore, ought not to intrude on the debate here. However, I've been waiting for someone - anyone - to demonstrate why it is that Mr Carter has refused to debate with Alan Dershowitz the allegations he makes in his book.

Carter, as I recall, was not much of a president, his good intentions notwithstanding. (Didn't someone mention the road to hell is paved with those?) He gave in too often to Brzezinski (spelling?) and was responsible, ultimately, for the botched raid on Tehran.

But this aside, why does he not admit to the millions of dollars Ehrenfeld traces in donations to the Carter Centre by the House of Saud or the donations made by the Sheik of Dubai, both not exactly lovers of all things Jewish? No, Mr Carter has a lot to answer for, his book being only the latest.

More information may be found at http://adershowitz.gather.com/ and Dershowitz's challenge at http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976879837

I now suppose I'll have the liberal lobby baying for my blood.

Regards,
Lane
I expect Carter has said his piece in book, and will probably not debate anyone.
I think people who read his book will make up their own minds without help of Dershowitz .
As far as military blunders , you will hear no excuse for liberals from me.
I remember the "rescue" attempt well. One of the stupidest operations I have seen, no way possible to be successful. If it hadn't failed in desert , even greater loss of life would have happened.
I used to get very excited when these idiotic things were attempted --now I am used to it.
The Carter rescue --the Marine occupation in Lebanon{ Reagan}--occupation of Iraq-- all crazy , and blunders.
Makes one wonder who advises these things ? :(
Glad you made comment , you are welcome and not a intruder!.
Nobody baying for blood.........yet! ;) >f
laneseda said:
I now suppose I'll have the liberal lobby baying for my blood.

Regards,
Lane
Not to worry, we have them house trained and fearful of the whip.
;)
Hahaha okay, gbrumb, I'll take your word for that.

If I may address Fidelista, the main point I was trying to make is this: Carter accuses Israel of maintaining a disproportionate degree of influence in Washington and the media. In fact, he suggests that the media (and some politicians) benefit from Israeli largesse. On the other hand, Mr Carter fails to make any mention of the millions that have been paid into the Carter Centre by some nations and individuals who hold decidedly anti-Jewish beliefs. Also, Mr Carter personally had no compunction in accepting Arab-sourced funding to help retain his farm. Surely, if he is going to make allegations of impropriety he must be, and must be seen to be, above such behaviour himself

Why does he not initiate legal action against Ehrenfeld who claims he has personally benefitted from Saudi funding or against Dershowitz who adds to Ehrenfeld's claims? What does he have to hide if he is above such behaviour as he implies by his statements in his book? Has he, as Dershowitz implies, become a mouthpiece for the Arab lobby by dint of their funding?

Being an incompetent president is one thing. Using the mantle of being an ex-president to make moral judgements he is unable to defend is quite another. That smacks of hypocrisy in the extreme. Even more than mine in commenting upon an ex-leader of another country.

Regards,
Lane
See less See more
laneseda said:
Being an incompetent president is one thing. Using the mantle of being an ex-president to make moral judgements he is unable to defend is quite another. That smacks of hypocrisy in the extreme. Even more than mine in commenting upon an ex-leader of another country.

Regards,
Lane
Excellent points made. And don't worry about commenting on Jimmy, turn around is fair play as we find the Queen rather frumpy. Happy Birthday to her by the way and I do forgive her for not waving back to me outside Windsor. ;)
the 109th senate will have 11 Jewish members and the House 26 Jewish members
Fidelista said:
I honestly know no one on left--personally --that wants the Israeli to be wiped out , or without a nation, but you will hear critisism from the left , while the right is generally silent.
I believe the democrats do support Israel ,and always have , not likely Israel would have survived were it not so. There continues to be strong support in Congress --by both Dems and Repubs --but some of the liberals do have limits . Others offer blanket support regardless of subject.
The lobby? . Not the actual lobbies. By lobby I mean those very vocal defenders of anything Israeli. Make a negative observation of a Israeli policy or action and they make more noise than a frightened flock of geese !
I expect Jews to react to attack, not to would be unrealistic.
I believe Carters book, although written as he sees things, recollects, is not ALL wrong.
One thing that is frustrating about Israel vs Palestine is this . When bargaining for peace , Israel bargains from such a position of power , they are far less likely to make any real consessions. They are not worried with survival of State , and have continued to gain real estate over years. I think thats what frustrates people of my "political bent'.
Its a given that it would be this way as Israel is not only a military power, but a economic one , with complete and unconditional support of a super power.
As far as condemning the Palestinians, it obvious that their leadership has went downhill.
Hamas and other militant groups have made things nearly impossible to fix , and empowered the hawks {likud} in Israel. The best time for resolution has passed , in the 80's IMO.
The future looks pretty bleak to me now and I have no good anwers.
As far as current anti-semitism--hatred of Jews in Europe ? . I can't really offer opinion other than I have read history.
I do know that much support of Israel in the U.S. comes not only from politic, but from religious influences. How this plays in Europe , I don't know.
I am glad to see you recognize that Carter is not a anti-semite, or condones murder of Jews. Thats one reason I read your posts carefully, you don't seem to align with crack-pots.:)
I do really condemn the lack of free-speech in Europe !. If a nutcase says Jews were not slaughtered in WW2--he has right to make fool of himself.
I am amazed that Europeans would stand for speech restrictions -- not much different than Cuba!.
I guess I am spoiled with U.S.freedoms --proud actually. >f
Actually the right is more supportive of the State of Israel then the left. Just look at the neo-cons, the religious right, the Rockefeller Republicans etc. Now you might not know any members of the left who want to destroy the state of Israel. What many want is a ONE STATE solution, in reality the destruction of the state of Israel. Others, by their continuous attacks on Israel (with absolutely no corresponding attacks on Palestenian terrorists), engender the gross anti-semitiism that prevails in most of Europe and throughout the Middle East.
Fidelista said:
I honestly know no one on left--personally --that wants the Israeli to be wiped out , or without a nation, but you will hear critisism from the left , while the right is generally silent.
I believe the democrats do support Israel ,and always have , not likely Israel would have survived were it not so. There continues to be strong support in Congress --by both Dems and Repubs --but some of the liberals do have limits . Others offer blanket support regardless of subject.
The lobby? . Not the actual lobbies. By lobby I mean those very vocal defenders of anything Israeli. Make a negative observation of a Israeli policy or action and they make more noise than a frightened flock of geese !
I expect Jews to react to attack, not to would be unrealistic.
I believe Carters book, although written as he sees things, recollects, is not ALL wrong.
One thing that is frustrating about Israel vs Palestine is this . When bargaining for peace , Israel bargains from such a position of power , they are far less likely to make any real consessions. They are not worried with survival of State , and have continued to gain real estate over years. I think thats what frustrates people of my "political bent'.
Its a given that it would be this way as Israel is not only a military power, but a economic one , with complete and unconditional support of a super power.
As far as condemning the Palestinians, it obvious that their leadership has went downhill.
Hamas and other militant groups have made things nearly impossible to fix , and empowered the hawks {likud} in Israel. The best time for resolution has passed , in the 80's IMO.
The future looks pretty bleak to me now and I have no good anwers.
As far as current anti-semitism--hatred of Jews in Europe ? . I can't really offer opinion other than I have read history.
I do know that much support of Israel in the U.S. comes not only from politic, but from religious influences. How this plays in Europe , I don't know.
I am glad to see you recognize that Carter is not a anti-semite, or condones murder of Jews. Thats one reason I read your posts carefully, you don't seem to align with crack-pots.:)
I do really condemn the lack of free-speech in Europe !. If a nutcase says Jews were not slaughtered in WW2--he has right to make fool of himself.
I am amazed that Europeans would stand for speech restrictions -- not much different than Cuba!.
I guess I am spoiled with U.S.freedoms --proud actually. >f
Nahhh, he just thinks that the deliberate targeting of innocent Jews should not be considered "terrorism". :rolleyes:
LANMaster said:
Deliberate targeting of civilians is a form of terrorism, Jew or no.
No matter whether indiscriminate bombing/shelling of a city-- or a simple car bomb.
It seems to me that the rationale for terror plays a part, after all the U.S.and West are masters of mass destruction of cities.
I think Carter is aware of that fact.
I read nowhere in his book where he condones murder/terror, in fact , it seems to be his mission to stop it.
Is his method wrong ? the way he seeks to implement ? --matter for debate.
If he really did condone murdering Jews , I doubt he would have had the friendship of any Israeli --let alone some in leadership, which he has enjoyed.
I believe his view of how to stop the slaughter , bring peace , is not accepted by some ,seem as wrong, but that is far away from being an anti-semite.
I think you tend to get carried away with your statements when you disagree politically.
Carter seems to me to suffer from a over-active sense of idealism---justice , and wishes that events would follow his expectations --not going to happen there.
Read the book and then bring points to bear, thats what it is for.
Simply parroting some Zionist foes does not convict Carter of being a anti-semite.
Its does the cause of Israel no favor when charges of this kind are leveled at a past -President who has spent so much time promoting peace { and not just in Mid-East}.
BTW, I do agree with linsky about 90% of time . Maybe not how to achieve solution, method, but end result--the one state solution is out of question--never work.>f
See less See more
Fidelista said:
Deliberate targeting of civilians is a form of terrorism, Jew or no.
No matter whether indiscriminate bombing/shelling of a city-- or a simple car bomb.
It seems to me that the rationale for terror plays a part, after all the U.S.and West are masters of mass destruction of cities.
I think Carter is aware of that fact.
I read nowhere in his book where he condones murder/terror, in fact , it seems to be his mission to stop it.
Is his method wrong ? the way he seeks to implement ? --matter for debate.
If he really did condone murdering Jews , I doubt he would have had the friendship of any Israeli --let alone some in leadership, which he has enjoyed.
I believe his view of how to stop the slaughter , bring peace , is not accepted by some ,seem as wrong, but that is far away from being an anti-semite.
I think you tend to get carried away with your statements when you disagree politically.
Carter seems to me to suffer from a over-active sense of idealism---justice , and wishes that events would follow his expectations --not going to happen there.
Read the book and then bring points to bear, thats what it is for.
Simply parroting some Zionist foes does not convict Carter of being a anti-semite.
Its does the cause of Israel no favor when charges of this kind are leveled at a past -President who has spent so much time promoting peace { and not just in Mid-East}.
BTW, I do agree with linsky about 90% of time . Maybe not how to achieve solution, method, but end result--the one state solution is out of question--never work.>f
No ****e! ;)
Fidelista said:
Deliberate targeting of civilians is a form of terrorism, Jew or no.
Then apparently you and President Carter disagree on the subject.
No matter whether indiscriminate bombing/shelling of a city-- or a simple car bomb.
It seems to me that the rationale for terror plays a part, after all the U.S.and West are masters of mass destruction of cities.
I think Carter is aware of that fact.
I read nowhere in his book where he condones murder/terror, in fact , it seems to be his mission to stop it.
Is his method wrong ? the way he seeks to implement ? --matter for debate.
If he really did condone murdering Jews , I doubt he would have had the friendship of any Israeli --let alone some in leadership, which he has enjoyed.
I believe his view of how to stop the slaughter , bring peace , is not accepted by some ,seem as wrong, but that is far away from being an anti-semite.
I think you tend to get carried away with your statements when you disagree politically.
Carter seems to me to suffer from a over-active sense of idealism---justice , and wishes that events would follow his expectations --not going to happen there.
Read the book and then bring points to bear, thats what it is for.
Simply parroting some Zionist foes does not convict Carter of being a anti-semite.
Its does the cause of Israel no favor when charges of this kind are leveled at a past -President who has spent so much time promoting peace { and not just in Mid-East}.
BTW, I do agree with linsky about 90% of time . Maybe not how to achieve solution, method, but end result--the one state solution is out of question--never work.>f
Did you even bother to read the article in post #1?

His own staff is abandoning him because even those close to him recognize his clear anti-semitism.
LANMaster said:
Then apparently you and President Carter disagree on the subject.

Did you even bother to read the article in post #1?

His own staff is abandoning him because even those close to him recognize his clear anti-semitism.
So, you want them to actually admit the facts? That would blow their whole side of the "debate".:D
LANMaster said:
Then apparently you and President Carter disagree on the subject.

Did you even bother to read the article in post #1?

His own staff is abandoning him because even those close to him recognize his clear anti-semitism.
Yes I read #1 post, and comments by all.
I have also read the book .
What do you think of the book overall???. Any agreement, anywhere???
I am not interested in what a "Dershowitz " says , or a group of rabbi's.
Interested in what people here think -- not what someone tells them to think. >f
poochee said:
He really cares about humanity and speaks out so he will be attacked.
PHP:
.....probably done more to actually help the needy than any other past president.......:up:
21 - 40 of 46 Posts
Top