Tech Support Guy banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON.
The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has
YET TO BE ACTED ON.
So, this ELECTRONIC BOOKLET should be reprinted, reposted,
set up on web pages and circulated far and wide.

http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/hoax/mcfadden.htm
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
JOINT RESOLUTION TO SUSPEND THE GOLD STANDARD
AND ABROGATE THE GOLD CLAUSE
JUNE 5, 1933
H.J.192 73rd Cong. 1st Sess.
Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United States.

Whereas the holding of or dealing in gold affect the public interest, and therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; and

Whereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency of the United States, or in an amount of money of the United States measured thereby, obstruct the power of the Congress to regulate the value of money of the United States, and are inconsistent with the declared policy of the Congress to maintain at all times the equal power of every dollar, coined or issued by the United States, in the markets and in payment of debts.

Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

That (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount of money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provisions is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency which at the time is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law.

(b) As used in the resolution, the term "obligation" means an obligation (including every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United States; and the term "coin or currency" means coin or currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations.

SEC. 2. The last sentence of paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of section 43 of the Act entitled "An Act to relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing agricultural purchasing power, to raise revenue for extraordinary expenses incurred by reason of such emergency, to provide emergency relief with respect to agricultural indebtedness, to provide for the orderly liquidation of joint-stock land banks, and for other purposes", approved May 12, 1933, is amended to read as follows:

"All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations)hereunto and hereafter coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, for public and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues, except gold coins, when below the standard weight and limit of tolerance provided by law for the single piece, shall be legal tender only at valuation in proportion to their actual weight." Approved June 5,1933, 4:30 p.m.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Stoner, I have to agree with the one on Father Charles E. Coughlin he is too radical for me. I know some who would love to have his books however I choose not to bother reading them because of his past.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
47,448 Posts
Aside from his bigotry, Coughlin also appeared the scam artist

http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/coughlin.html

excerpt>>>>>>>>

On November 11, 1934, Father Charles Coughlin established his own political organization, the National Union for Social Justice. The purpose of this group was to "affirm the sanctity of private property" and to gain support against the Roosevelt administration. Coughlin pushed for an economic plan that would create ease for the people by creating a more plentiful money supply. The National Union for Social Justice pushed for the silver standard, arguing that this metal was more plentiful and it would in turn increase the amount of money circulating within the economy. However, FDR resisited this idea, and later had an article published naming the largest silver holders in America. To everyone's surprise, Coughlin and the National Union for Social Justice were one of the largest silver holders in the nation 6 .
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,503 Posts
linskyjack said:
It's that eye on top of the pyramid that we have to worry about!
You may be a cynic (I know a "postive" cynic) but sometimes you're a funny arse cynic! LOL
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
linskyjack said:
Father Coughlin--one of the great bigots of the 20th Century---I'm telling you, watch that eye on the pyramid and the secret cabal of Masons.
Why is it that most Mason's today have no idea what is really going on? I know for a fact they truly do not know I believe it isn't till they are a 33rd that they are told and then again I was told that in order to be a 33rd you had to something heroic and then you are upped to the 33rd. Does anyone here know the answer to this. I know several Mason's and they have no idea and when I send them information they are like this is not true. I know for a fact it is not a matter of a cover up with the ones I know. I would appreciate any info on this. Bobbie
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,302 Posts
faithchris, I read that the Mason from the 30th or 31st degress are the ones who know whats going on and what Masonry is all about. I think it was Albert pike who said that only the 31st to 33rd degrees knew about the luciferian doctrine!

Interestingly enough, I live in scotland, Glasgow, and within the 2 years the Masonic hall in my neighbourhood, decided to advertise themselves by putting the compass and square outside of the building where their hall is. This a whole tenenment block which would have 6 flats, but it's all a Masonic hall.

http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm

http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Freemasonry.htm

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/tracingboard.html

khaz
 

· Registered
Joined
·
127 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Hi khazars, I appreciate the information but I have to beg to differ and maybe it is correct in some circumstances but the masons I know really don't have a clue what is going on within the Mason's and I know one which is a 32nd. I had read you had to be a 33rd to learn the true story. I suppose they can all do it differently and/or only include the ones whom they believe would stand for there cause. I will have to read the sites you have sent to me and learn more about this. Thanks so much. Bobbie
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top